apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Trawick <traw...@attglobal.net>
Subject Re: [PATCH] apr_proc_wait
Date Tue, 23 Oct 2001 18:19:41 GMT
Branko ─îibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:

> Jeff Trawick wrote:
> >Ryan Bloom <rbb@covalent.net> writes:
> >
> >> This patch implements my idea for a new API to apr_proc_wait and
> >> apr_proc_all_wait.
> >>
> >
> ><nitpick>
> >I'm a wee bit nervous that we use an enumerated type for a bitmask.
> >Using an enumeration for the values of the bits seems fine but maybe
> >using some unsigned int value is best?  We'd expect an enumerated type
> >to hold only the values in the enumeration, not some OR of some of
> >them.
> ></nitpick>
> >
> Not so. ISO C explicitly allows this use of enums (and so does ISO C++)..

"We" refers to people, not standards documents or compilers :)

Like I said, it is a nitpick and not something I intend to lose any
sleep over.

Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net | PGP public key at web site:
             Born in Roswell... married an alien...

View raw message