apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kevin Pilch-Bisson <ke...@pilch-bisson.net>
Subject Re: [PATCH] Re: cvs commit: apr/threadproc/unix proc.c
Date Tue, 16 Oct 2001 12:53:15 GMT
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 08:41:35AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Ryan Bloom <rbb@covalent.net> writes:
> 
> > On Monday 15 October 2001 10:38 am, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > 
> > I seriously doubt that we want to extend the apr_proc_t type anymore.  Having
> > this type be complete has caused Windows to have to jump through hoops to
> > keep track of processes correctly, and adding more to it is a
> > mistake IMO.
> 
> (rest of Ryan's comments omitted)
> 
> I'll reimplement according to your suggestions and post again.

Ryan's solution seems fine to me.  We're not usually too concerned with programs
exiting due to a signal, since we are just running diff, patch or a small
script.  Sorry to have overlooked that when I made the patch before.  Thanks for
noticing it Jeff.

> -- 
> Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net | PGP public key at web site:
>        http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
>              Born in Roswell... married an alien...

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Kevin Pilch-Bisson                    http://www.pilch-bisson.net
     "Historically speaking, the presences of wheels in Unix
     has never precluded their reinvention." - Larry Wall
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Mime
View raw message