Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 66756 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2001 16:26:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 66733 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2001 16:26:16 -0000 From: "Sander Striker" To: , Subject: RE: Release time? Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 18:26:16 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20010919151902.2D44646DFD@koj.rkbloom.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > -----Original Message----- > From: Ryan Bloom [mailto:rbb@covalent.net] > Sent: 19 September 2001 17:19 > I would like to move APR to a releasable state finally. To do > this, we need to > finish the locking API at the very least. Does anybody have > other issues that > need to be resolved? > > Ryan Do we wish to keep or remove sms? I realize a fair amount of time went into it, but performance wise it didn't cut it (due to the extra indirection). There might be applications for it, but right now it is only extra baggage. Is anyone using sms currently, or planning to? Other issues before release might be going over all the functions one more time and check for consistency in argument ordering. Changes to ordering have been postponed because the functions were being used in httpd and elsewhere, but I think the release should be as consistent as possible with respect to argument ordering for ease of use. I realize this impacts a big ammount of code, but still think it is worth it. If it is out there there is no chance of changing the API anymore. Sander