Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 48876 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2001 13:20:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 48863 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2001 13:20:18 -0000 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010905091629.00a536a0@mail.charter.net> X-Sender: gregmm@mail.charter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 09:19:27 -0400 To: dev@apr.apache.org, dev@httpd.apache.org From: Greg Marr Subject: Re: Fw: Regarding lower-case HTML tags In-Reply-To: <047401c135b8$d39eaa50$93c0b0d0@roweclan.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N At 11:12 PM 09/04/2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > > I've been using tidy, from the w3c, for a while now, to do > > > pretty-reformatting of HTML documents. One of the things that > it does is > > > lower-case HTML tags. I was wondering, in light of comments > made a week > > > or two ago, whether it would be worthwhile to do this with > files in the > > > docs as I a working with them? The reason it does that is that XML is case-sensitive for tag names, and the HTML working group chose to use lowercase for XHTML. Thus, if the pages were ever to be marked as XHTML, they'd need to be lowercase. -- Greg Marr gregm@alum.wpi.edu "We thought you were dead." "I was, but I'm better now." - Sheridan, "The Summoning"