Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 28431 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2001 08:32:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 28402 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2001 08:32:03 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: kurgan.lyra.org: gstein set sender to gstein@lyra.org using -f Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 01:35:15 -0700 From: Greg Stein To: Justin Erenkrantz Cc: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add return value to apr_proc_wait Message-ID: <20010920013515.G4050@lyra.org> Mail-Followup-To: Justin Erenkrantz , dev@apr.apache.org References: <20010919231400.R12417@ebuilt.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <20010919231400.R12417@ebuilt.com>; from jerenkrantz@ebuilt.com on Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 11:14:00PM -0700 X-URL: http://www.lyra.org/greg/ X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 11:14:00PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: >... > How would this patch work? This seems like a reasonable change. > > Win32 doesn't implement wait_all from what I can tell, so I'm not > sure how to get the return value. OtherBill or Ryan can probably > figure this out. -- justin We already have a patch from Bill Tutt for Win32 that changes the signature in the same way as yours. With your patch and his, we should be pretty well set. Applying both momentarily... Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/