apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brian Pane <bp...@pacbell.net>
Subject Re: apr_table_t (was: Re: Release time?)
Date Wed, 19 Sep 2001 22:07:27 GMT
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:


>In the case of tables, the minimum api I would accept includes a duplicate
>and truncate function.  Also (of course) the existing add, as well as an
>insert (since we loose the ability to do so with this change.)

Insert?  For a table, insert==add, because it's an unordered collection.
Similarly, the semantics of truncate would be unpredictable.

>In the case of hashes, we still need an efficient duplicate.

I agree.


View raw message