apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkra...@ebuilt.com>
Subject Re: [proposal] apr_thread_setconcurrency()
Date Sun, 16 Sep 2001 16:19:34 GMT
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 12:55:10AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> The testlock case doesn't matter because it never hits any of the 
> Solaris-defined entry points.  This is a quirk in the OS and I see 
> no reason to work around it.  If you want to make testlock do the 
> right thing with the Solaris LWP model, use a reader/writer lock
> to synchronize the starting of the threads.  This way you guarantee 
> that all threads are started before you start execution of the 
> tight exclusive loop (which is something that testlock doesn't do 
> now).  You are assuming that the threads are created in parallel -
> nowhere is that ordering is guaranteed.

I noticed that your new testlockperf.c does exactly that (testlock.c
doesn't).  Do you still see the serialization on Solaris MP with 
LWPs?  I will try running it here and see what happens.  -- justin

View raw message