Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 21569 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2001 12:40:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 21551 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2001 12:40:04 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: rdu26-58-158.nc.rr.com: trawick set sender to trawick@attglobal.net using -f Sender: trawick@rdu26-58-158.nc.rr.com To: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: APR_INCOMPLETE confusion From: Jeff Trawick Date: 03 Aug 2001 08:28:53 -0400 Message-ID: Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N I'm happy to create a new APR_INCOMPLETE_CHAR status, hijack the current doc for APR_INCOMPLETE, and change Apache/APR as appropriate. Does APR_INCOMPLETE (for incomplete file status) need to be renamed as well for clarity? APR_INCOMPLETE_STATUS may be sufficiently clear. Comments? -- Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net | PGP public key at web site: http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/ Born in Roswell... married an alien...