Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 58762 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2001 05:44:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 58751 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2001 05:44:03 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: cobra.cs.Virginia.EDU: jcw5q owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 01:44:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Cliff Woolley X-X-Sender: To: Ian Holsman cc: Subject: Re: SMS -- do we still need it? In-Reply-To: <998718295.5048.21.camel@c1619481-a.almda1.sfba.home.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 24 Aug 2001, Ian Holsman wrote: > hi. > I was just wondering if anyone is still planning to optimize > the SMS memory code, or have people given up on it. > > If they have, we should remove it, or at a minimum move it off > to the side somewhere. I'm still hoping it will help with buckets... I just haven't gotten around to patching them yet to try it. I'll try to get back into that soon. --Cliff -------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley cliffwoolley@yahoo.com Charlottesville, VA