Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-4095-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org
Received: (qmail 24659 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2001 15:51:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:dev@apr.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@apr.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@apr.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dev-subscribe@apr.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org
Received: (qmail 24648 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2001 15:51:03 -0000
From: "Sander Striker" <striker@apache.org>
To: "Ian Holsman" <IanH@cnet.com>
Cc: <dev@httpd.apache.org>,
	<dev@apr.apache.org>
Subject: RE: Memory management requirements buckets/brigades, new pools
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 18:02:10 +0200
Message-ID: <JLEGKKNELMHCJPNMOKHOMEDCEHAA.striker@apache.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
In-Reply-To: <998840568.2849.1.camel@c1619481-a.almda1.sfba.home.com>
Importance: Normal
X-Spam-Rating: 64.125.133.20 1.6.2 0/1000/N

> Hi Sander.
> is it possible to post patches from the most recent CVS version.
> that would make it much easier for people to apply them

Ok, I agree with you on applyability, but for readability that
is quite different.  Want me to post some patches against recent
CVS?

> Thanks
> ...Ian

Sander