apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sander Striker" <stri...@apache.org>
Subject RE: Review of possible replacement for pools
Date Sat, 25 Aug 2001 18:30:56 GMT
Attached is a patch for the suggested additional flag to
be able to share and use a pool across threads.

Sander

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:jerenkrantz@ebuilt.com]
> Sent: 25 August 2001 19:57
> To: Sander Striker
> Cc: dev@apr.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Review of possible replacement for pools
> 
> 
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 08:05:03PM +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
> > Adding an option to apr_pool_create_ex to indicate that the pool is
> > going to be shared across threads would be an option I can certainly
> > live with.  OTOH, this will introduce an extra if(lock) pair in the
> > apr_palloc and apr_pcalloc calls.  I'll send in a patch later on.
> 
> If you aren't shared, you have an extra NULL-check.  I think that is
> acceptable.  If you are shared, we make sure we can't get trounced.
> 
> > I didn't implement apr_prealloc yet, but would like to know if people
> > would find it usefull.  If so, I will post a patch.
> 
> Probably - I've come across the need for such a function before.  But,
> it does get to be tricky to implement.  -- justin
> 
> 
> 
> 
Mime
View raw message