apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ryan Bloom <...@covalent.net>
Subject Re: [API PROPOSAL] apr_lock.h breakout of functionality, add cond vars
Date Wed, 29 Aug 2001 18:28:04 GMT
On Wednesday 29 August 2001 11:25, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 10:50:12AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > My only other comment, is that while doing development, it would be
> > REALLY cool if we could have access to both API's, which should end up
> > pointing to the same implementation.
> +1 *if* we keep both APIs.  Otherwise, +0 - I'm not against it, but I'm
> not for it either.  -- justin

We should only keep both API's for the short term.  Any API that we release
in a beta we need to support forever, so I am VERY much against releasing
a beta with the old locking API, because it is a very poor API.


Ryan Bloom				rbb@apache.org
Covalent Technologies			rbb@covalent.net

View raw message