Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 70336 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2001 17:14:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 70322 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2001 17:14:13 -0000 Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 10:14:16 -0700 (PDT) From: dean gaudet To: Brian Pane cc: Subject: Re: Observations on fragmentation in SMS pools In-Reply-To: <3B481014.80707@pacbell.net> Message-ID: X-comment: visit http://arctic.org/~dean/legal for information regarding copyright and disclaimer. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N an ideal situation for free-lists (blocks of freed, but not free()d memory) is one per cpu. a less ideal situation is one per thread. an even less ideal situation is one per process (which requires locking). it's insane to have one per pool :) -dean