Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 55448 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2001 22:46:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 55437 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2001 22:46:16 -0000 Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2001 15:44:48 -0700 (PDT) From: X-Sender: To: dean gaudet Cc: Subject: Re: apr_is_option_set / apr_set_option / netmask In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N > why aren't basic bit manipulations being done directly? the function call > overhead is enormous compared to the operations being performed. I am about to commit a patch that turns those functions into macros that do the same thing. > also... when i saw the field named netmask i kind of assumed it was a > network address mask, which is usually what "netmask" refers to. why does > it appear to be a bunch of flag bits instead? I am leaving the netmask alone, because I haven't looked at it before. Feel free to make the names better though. :-) Ryan _____________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org Covalent Technologies rbb@covalent.net -----------------------------------------------------------------------------