Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 55315 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2001 21:52:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 55271 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2001 21:51:55 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: cobra.cs.Virginia.EDU: jcw5q owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 17:51:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Cliff Woolley X-X-Sender: To: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton cc: Subject: Re: exploration of APR goes on In-Reply-To: <20010709235003.F18140@angua.rince.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > it doesn't do getuid() / geteuid() - it does getpwnam / getpwuid. > > so there's no means to obtain _current_ user id of running > process, only a lookup from a username (or userid). Oh, duh, yeah, you're right. Sorry, wasn't thinking. I guess we should add that as a new function... --Cliff -------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley cliffwoolley@yahoo.com Charlottesville, VA