Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 29173 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2001 01:40:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 29160 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2001 01:40:25 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: cobra.cs.Virginia.EDU: jcw5q owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 21:40:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Cliff Woolley X-X-Sender: To: David Reid cc: APR Development List Subject: Re: Observations on fragmentation in SMS pools In-Reply-To: <006e01c10817$83509190$400b5e3f@VAIO> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, David Reid wrote: > I guess also I'm wondering if we should apply my patch. For all the reasons > given it's not ideal, but it's a starting point, and if in 2 weeks it looks > totally different, well, no bother, but at least it lets everyone work on it > with a minimum of fuss... Opinions? 3 +1's and I'll commit while I'm in > Pheonix (got a nice connection) Please wait until we get a beta2 on Apache (hopefully 2.0.20 will happen tonight and it'll live up to scrutiny and make it to beta status). After that, I'm +1 on concept (haven't looked at the details of the patch yet, but I will). --Cliff -------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley cliffwoolley@yahoo.com Charlottesville, VA