Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 71595 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2001 02:49:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 71560 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2001 02:49:36 -0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/9.0.2509 Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 03:49:18 +0100 Subject: Re: libapr and --disable-shared? From: "Pier P. Fumagalli" To: jean-frederic clere CC: "tomcat dev jakarta.apache.org" , Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <3B445F6E.233FA23A@fujitsu-siemens.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Organization: Apache Software Foundation Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N jean-frederic clere at jfrederic.clere@fujitsu-siemens.com wrote: > >> DOH! ???? So why do you keep saying that you're against using sources... >> Since all those problems are simply fixed by using them.... > > No, I am not against using the APR sources, I was just thinking that the time > needed to change mod_webapp could have been used to fix APR. (But it is more > complicated that I excepted it). Do you think I didn't think about it? So, can you roll back that -1 so I can commit some changes? Thanks :) Pier