Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Subject: Re: cvs commit: apr/include apr_sms.h apr_portable.h
From: Ian Holsman <ianh@cnet.com>
To: dev@apr.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <20010707002703.E28500@ebuilt.com>
References: <20010707064224.18512.qmail@apache.org>
	<20010706235032.C28500@ebuilt.com> <3B46B921.F2F7AABE@jetnet.co.uk>
	<20010707002703.E28500@ebuilt.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 07 Jul 2001 08:37:14 -0700
Message-Id: <994520234.12689.5.camel@c1619481-a.almda1.sfba.home.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0

On 07 Jul 2001 00:27:03 -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 08:24:17AM +0100, David Reid wrote:
> > Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > 
> > > On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 06:42:24AM -0000, dreid@apache.org wrote:
> > > >   BTW, do we still need to add the @deffunc lines as we don't seem to
> > > >   have been doing in some places.  Is this a scandoc change Ben?
> > >
> > > Ben's gone on record saying we don't use scandoc anymore, but doxygen.
> > > (Check dev@apr archives around Jun 9th and 10th.)
> > >
> > > Go figure.  No one else seems to be aware of that.  =)  -- justin
> > 
> > Ah yes, I meant doxygen not scandoc...  That's what you get for being up
> > all night again :)

BTW...
I have a nightly job which runs doxygen on the httpd tree.. available on
docx.webperf.org


> > 
> > Maybe Ben would be so kind as to answer this once and for all?
> 
> Based on what Ben said in that earlier thread, doxygen doesn't use
> @deffunc (only scandoc does).  No one has had the time to yank out 
> all of those @deffunc lines with a perl script.  Any perl hackers 
> out there?  -- justin
--
Ian Holsman
Performance Measurement & Analysis
CNET Networks    -    415 364-8608