Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <3B6777DB.7080500@cnet.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 20:30:35 -0700
From: Ian Holsman <ianh@cnet.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
 rv:0.9.2+) Gecko/20010728
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkrantz@ebuilt.com>
CC: Graham Leggett <minfrin@sharp.fm>, APR Development <dev@apr.apache.org>
Subject: Re: apr-util + LDAP: How to handle status codes
References: <3B667733.21E8D733@sharp.fm> <20010731201159.N18358@ebuilt.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Justin Erenkrantz wrote:

>On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 11:15:31AM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
>
>>Is this the right way to do things? Or should there be a mapping to
>>APR_LDAP_* status codes from LDAP_* status codes?
>>
>
>I'd suggest that we should map the APR_LDAP_* status codes from LDAP_*.
>We can do this by allocating an offset.  So, just do:
>
>apr_status_t status = ldap_fn_result_code + APR_LDAP_ERROR_START;
>
>or something like that.  We have that precedent somewhere.  How many
>numbers would we need?  I don't remember how many the LDAP library
>defines.  -- justin
>


would it be possible to have a apr_ldap_errstr( apr_status_t ) function 
which would
convert the numbers into messages?