Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 29672 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2001 07:24:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 29661 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2001 07:24:37 -0000 Sender: dreid@jetnet.co.uk Message-ID: <3B46B921.F2F7AABE@jetnet.co.uk> Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2001 08:24:17 +0100 From: David Reid Reply-To: dreid@jetnet.co.uk X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.3-BETA i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: apr dev Subject: Re: cvs commit: apr/include apr_sms.h apr_portable.h References: <20010707064224.18512.qmail@apache.org> <20010706235032.C28500@ebuilt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 06:42:24AM -0000, dreid@apache.org wrote: > > BTW, do we still need to add the @deffunc lines as we don't seem to > > have been doing in some places. Is this a scandoc change Ben? > > Ben's gone on record saying we don't use scandoc anymore, but doxygen. > (Check dev@apr archives around Jun 9th and 10th.) > > Go figure. No one else seems to be aware of that. =) -- justin Ah yes, I meant doxygen not scandoc... That's what you get for being up all night again :) Maybe Ben would be so kind as to answer this once and for all? david