Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 09:08:06 -0700
From: Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkrantz@ebuilt.com>
To: new-httpd@apache.org, rbb@covalent.net
Cc: dev@apr.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PATH] MPMT single acceptor patch
Message-ID: <20010724090806.L26972@ebuilt.com>
References: <01072408445202.03564@koj.rkbloom.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <01072408445202.03564@koj.rkbloom.net>;
 from rbb@covalent.net on Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 08:44:52AM -0700

[ Adding dev@apr ]

On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 08:44:52AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> 
> 
> This patch uses the original fdqueue.[ch] logic to implement the single acceptor, multiple
> worker logic in the threaded MPM.  The original fdqueue logic can be found in apache-apr, but
> I have attached a copy to this message.

Should we APRize the fdqueue.[ch] code and stick it in apr-util?  It
may be a little lightweight to merit that though.  However, it also 
relies on pthread condition variables.  Maybe now would be a good 
time to add condition variables to APR?  Do other platforms have
the concept of condition variables?

(I know Aaron would love to see condition variables in APR.)  -- justin