Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 53780 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2001 16:06:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 53645 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2001 16:06:17 -0000 Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 18:05:33 +0200 From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton To: Sander Striker Cc: Justin Erenkrantz , dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: Pools in threads Message-ID: <20010716180533.H21253@angua.rince.de> Mail-Followup-To: Sander Striker , Justin Erenkrantz , dev@apr.apache.org References: <20010715192127.S14852@ebuilt.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: ; from striker@apache.org on Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 09:05:40AM +0200 X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N > Nah. It would add the lines to add thread cancellation. The > 3.5 million LOC is the _entire_ dce rpc codebase. which includes about 15 separate services such as DCE/DFS, which is actually AFS [without the bugfixes and with a new RPC mechanism] which you don't need, as sander says. > Only part > of that is the dce threads library. And, I believe there are > some old dce/rpc team members in our midst who could know how > this all fit together. I could be wrong though. i'll ask. might get a response tomorrow. luke