Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 12701 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2001 18:41:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 12689 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2001 18:41:56 -0000 From: "Victor J. Orlikowski" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15196.28652.966567.412143@critterling.garfield.home> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 14:41:48 -0400 To: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: gethostbyaddr, et alia X-Mailer: VM 6.94 under Emacs 20.7.1 Reply-To: v.j.orlikowski@gte.net X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N So, gethostbyname is handled by gethostbyname_r, and the corresponding ifdefs.... Do we also need to handle gethostbyaddr and getservbyname in the same manner, for thread safety's sake? Also, I may be missing some history, but is there a reason that apr does not yet have an apr_gethostbyname function? Victor -- Victor J. Orlikowski | The Wall is Down, But the Threat Remains! ================================================================== v.j.orlikowski@gte.net | orlikowski@apache.org | vjo@us.ibm.com