apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From dean gaudet <dean-list-apr-...@arctic.org>
Subject apr_is_option_set / apr_set_option / netmask
Date Sat, 07 Jul 2001 17:26:57 GMT

why aren't basic bit manipulations being done directly?  the function call
overhead is enormous compared to the operations being performed.

also... when i saw the field named netmask i kind of assumed it was a
network address mask, which is usually what "netmask" refers to.  why does
it appear to be a bunch of flag bits instead?


View raw message