apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Cliff Woolley <cliffwool...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: sms_trivial locking Re: missing apr_pool_child_cleanup_set when using SMS?
Date Fri, 27 Jul 2001 13:56:45 GMT
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:

> > * The SMS-based implementation has to do essentially the same
> >   work, but it also does an extra function call (apr_sms_malloc
> >   calls apr_sms_trivial_malloc).
>
> okay: how about this.  in the cases where fast-optimisation
> is really really needed, how about calling the apr_sms_xxx_yyy()
> functions or even just function, direct?

Weren't we going to try switching apr_sms_malloc() from a function to a
macro?  You'd still need an extra pointer indirection, but that's better
than a full-blown function call...

--Cliff


--------------------------------------------------------------
   Cliff Woolley
   cliffwoolley@yahoo.com
   Charlottesville, VA



Mime
View raw message