apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <l...@samba-tng.org>
Subject Re: SMS Factory Re: cvs commit: apr/memory/unix apr_sms_threads.cMakefile.in
Date Thu, 19 Jul 2001 13:26:36 GMT
On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 02:53:59AM +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
> > would it be usefull to have some kind of 
> > 'sms_factory' which you could call
> > either with a identifier, or better yet, a set of capabilities it
> > requires from the SMS
> > (manysmallallocs, realeaseatend ) or ( bigallocs,tracking)
> > 
> > which could then give you the best match for your environment?
> Well, at that point you already know your environment, so we might
> as well create a small tool asking questions about environments.
> Something like so:
> Do you have lots of small allocations [y/n]? y
> Do you free your malloced blocks      [y/n]? n
> ...
> The best probable match is: <type>
> Where type is "std", "tracking", "trivial", "blocks", etc.
> Then you just put in a call to apr_sms_<type>_create on the spot.
> Each type also may have different parameters you can give it
> at create and a factory would make that more difficult.

this fits in well with having a bit-field in every SMS
[a new function]: what features do you support?

see other-post, 30mins ago.


View raw message