apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ryan Bloom <...@covalent.net>
Subject Re: [PATCH] APR thread updates and associated httpd-2.0 changes
Date Sat, 21 Jul 2001 16:09:32 GMT

> > Changed the worker routine's signature to take a single parameter:
> > apr_thread_param_t, which contains the opaque data and the apr_thread_t.
> Can we simply hide the details, and use our own _thread_main starting
> point? Put the thread start function ptr in this structure as well, have
> our _thread_main unwrap whatever is required (and it can create
> thread-local data, if we ever implement that), finally calling out to the
> user's *func?
> > httpd-2.0 will have to be updated after applying this patch to APR.
> Not if we hide this detail, I believe.  I don't know what that does about
> providing access to the apr_thread_t in the child thread.  Perhaps we
> declare the user's func as accepting arguments (apr_thread_t *me, void
> *mine).

That was where Aaron started, and I asked him to change it to this model.
This model is more extensible moving forward IMHO.


Ryan Bloom                        	rbb@apache.org
Covalent Technologies			rbb@covalent.net

View raw message