apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: [PATCH] Fix POD reading...
Date Sat, 21 Jul 2001 16:44:23 GMT
From: "Ryan Bloom" <rbb@covalent.net>
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2001 11:29 AM


> On Saturday 21 July 2001 09:16, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 08:07:50AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > > Here is my copy of the program.  It seems to work properly whether or
> > > not apr_file_read() is used.
> >
> > Yup.  Resetting the variable one did it.  No problem here but my own
> > stupidity.
> >
> > Now the question is whether we should switch threaded MPM to use
> > apr_file_read rather than apr_recv?  Does it make a difference?
> 
> We set that MPM to use the pipe as a socket so that we can use apr_poll on
> the pipe.  The underlying apr_recv and apr_read are basically the same
> function, so it really shouldn't matter.

Not on Win32 they aren't (read != recv).  This was the cause of years of mod_proxy
headaches when that module wasn't well maintained.


Mime
View raw message