Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 22215 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2001 16:44:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 22174 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2001 16:44:47 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: armstrong.cs.virginia.edu: jcw5q owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 12:45:40 -0400 From: Cliff Woolley X-X-Sender: To: Subject: Re: cvs commit: apr/locks/win32 locks.c In-Reply-To: <20010605081540.58016.qmail@apache.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 5 Jun 2001 dreid@apache.org wrote: > --- apr.h.in 2001/05/10 18:09:26 1.80 > +++ apr.h.in 2001/06/05 08:15:05 1.81 > @@ -174,6 +174,8 @@ > typedef @off_t_value@ apr_off_t; > typedef @socklen_t_value@ apr_socklen_t; > > +typedef struct apr_lock_t apr_lock_t; > +typedef struct apr_sms_t apr_sms_t; > ... > > typedef enum {APR_READER, APR_WRITER} apr_readerwriter_e; > - > -typedef struct apr_lock_t apr_lock_t; ... > > -typedef struct apr_sms_t apr_sms_t; > - Just out of curiousity, why was this necessary? --Cliff