Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 12:52:12 -0400 (EDT)
From: Cliff Woolley <cliffwoolley@yahoo.com>
To: Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkrantz@ebuilt.com>, dev@apr.apache.org
MMDF-Warning: Parse error in original version of preceding line at
 mail.virginia.edu
Subject: Re: GCC 2.96 optimization bug
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.31.0106241055100.25250-100000@lithium.elemental.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.32.0106241227050.57458-100000@node4.unix.Virginia.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Dale Ghent wrote:

> When Apache was compile sans -O2, everything worked well and there was no
> segfault.

What about -O?

> You're right... because of a 2.96 snapshot was used in RH, the use of
> 2.96 (I'm assuming any snapshot. I see that your's was older than mine)
> should probably tell autoconf not to include any optimization.

If you're gonna do that (which is probably unavoidable), there'd better be
a BIG warning message issued, obviously... but other than that, I have no
problem with this.

http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-2.96.html

--Cliff


--------------------------------------------------------------
   Cliff Woolley
   cliffwoolley@yahoo.com
   Charlottesville, VA