Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 42510 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2001 16:21:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 42481 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2001 16:21:55 -0000 Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 09:21:27 -0700 From: Justin Erenkrantz To: Ian Holsman Cc: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: GCC 2.96 optimization bug Message-ID: <20010625092127.Q25512@ebuilt.com> References: <20010624200702.G25512@ebuilt.com> <993482166.26456.0.camel@griffon.cnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <993482166.26456.0.camel@griffon.cnet.com>; from ianh@cnet.com on Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 08:16:06AM -0700 X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1-pre3 (http://amavis.org/) X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 08:16:06AM -0700, Ian Holsman wrote: > There was a update to GCC from redhat over the weekend, did you > apply that patch perhaps? I didn't touch anything. That's what makes it odd. It didn't work, and now it does. -- justin