Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 78897 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2001 03:38:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 78886 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2001 03:38:08 -0000 Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 20:37:41 -0700 From: Justin Erenkrantz To: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: apr-util/uri Makefile.in Message-ID: <20010605203741.O21860@ebuilt.com> References: <20010606033346.76915.qmail@apache.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010606033346.76915.qmail@apache.org>; from bjh@apache.org on Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 03:33:46AM -0000 X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1-pre3 (http://amavis.org/) X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 03:33:46AM -0000, bjh@apache.org wrote: > bjh 01/06/05 20:33:46 > > Modified: uri Makefile.in > Log: > Need to specify libtool objects so libtool is used to compile. > > Revision Changes Path > 1.5 +1 -1 apr-util/uri/Makefile.in > > Index: Makefile.in > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/cvs/apr-util/uri/Makefile.in,v > retrieving revision 1.4 > retrieving revision 1.5 > diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 > --- Makefile.in 2001/05/22 01:22:05 1.4 > +++ Makefile.in 2001/06/06 03:33:46 1.5 > @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ > # bring in rules.mk for standard functionality > @INCLUDE_RULES@ > > -gen_uri_delims_OBJECTS = gen_uri_delims.o > +gen_uri_delims_OBJECTS = gen_uri_delims.lo > gen_uri_delims: $(gen_uri_delims_OBJECTS) > $(LINK) $(EXTRA_LDFLAGS) $(gen_uri_delims_OBJECTS) $(EXTRA_LIBS) Roy initially pointed out that we shouldn't need libtool to compile gen_uri_delims - which is why it was gen_uri_delims.o. Is this not the case on OS/2? gen_uri_delims is only needed to produce the uri_delims.h file. That object file doesn't need to be slurped into the libaprutil.a file. I think Roy suggested ditching slurping in all .lo files and going for a more manual approach. -- justin