Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 6325 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2001 07:01:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 6314 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2001 07:01:22 -0000 Message-ID: <007801c10132$6d796770$7f00a8c0@VAIO> From: "David Reid" To: "APR Development List" References: <011401c100f2$1a1b7fe0$7f00a8c0@VAIO> <20010629192743.Y26239@ebuilt.com> Subject: Re: APR != HTTPD :) (Was: Re: problem with mod_webapp) Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 07:55:24 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N > On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 12:20:31AM +0100, David Reid wrote: > > Why? If we have shared libraries available can't it just use those? I mean > > at present I'm not sure apache can, so this whole area needs some looking at > > yet. > > The constant problem on tomcat-dev (and maybe tomcat-user, I don't > subscribe to that) is that people keep running into problems with MM. > mod_webapp is the only program, AFAIK, where APR is expected to be > installed rather than build from the source. > > On most Unix-based platforms, APR requires MM (included in the APR > source/tree), but does not include it in libapr.la - you need to also > link against it. The problem is that this is only noted in APRVARS - > which isn't installed by APR - it only lives in the source dirs. Well, longer term we plan to axe MM so this problem will probably cure itself :) That's the hope anyways. david