apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Trawick <trawi...@bellsouth.net>
Subject Re: cvs commit: apr/test testlock.c
Date Thu, 07 Jun 2001 13:30:15 GMT
Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkrantz@ebuilt.com> writes:

> Why were the apr_file_printf switched to printf?  printf isn't portable 
> or even supported by APR (so says Ryan).  I'd rather we ate our own dog 
> food here.  -- justin

[f]printf not portable?  huh?

How does the level of printf support in APR affect whether or not a
program which uses APR can use printf?

Note that we rely on APR-provided format strings to be compatible with
printf format strings whenever possible so that gcc can keep us honest.

-- 
Jeff Trawick | trawickj@bellsouth.net | PGP public key at web site:
       http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
             Born in Roswell... married an alien...


Mime
View raw message