apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Cliff Woolley <cliffwool...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: cvs commit: apr/threadproc/unix thread.c
Date Wed, 06 Jun 2001 19:02:44 GMT
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 06:12:17PM -0000, dreid@apache.org wrote:
> >   - add an apr_pool_t to the sms structure
>
> -1 (non-veto, but awfully close).  Uh, why are we doing this?
> I thought that a pool would be defined in terms of a sms (not now, but
> at some point).  This would not allow that to happen.
> I'm still not entirely sold on the fact that sms needs locks.  I think
> the locks can be handled at a higher level than sms (i.e. a pool).

I was thinking the exact same thing, actually...

--Cliff


--------------------------------------------------------------

   Cliff Woolley
   cliffwoolley@yahoo.com
   Charlottesville, VA



Mime
View raw message