apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sander Striker" <stri...@apache.org>
Subject RE: cvs commit: apr STATUS
Date Fri, 29 Jun 2001 10:11:10 GMT
>          ALLOC_USE_MALLOC would be faster than the current pool code for 
>          a threaded APR (but, I'm not sure).
>            Status: Justin volunteers
>   +                David and Sander are working on some stuff that 
>   +                should be ready Real Soon Now (TM).  Sander has
>   +                posted a "trivial" SMS (what a bad name) - see:

Yep, in the email to the list I stated that the name wasn't good.
Suggestions very welcome. Please refer to the post for naming issues.

>   +                <JLEGKKNELMHCJPNMOKHOEEAFEBAA.striker@samba-tng.org>
>   +                which uses the same memory management as the current 
>   +                pool implementation (freelist that allocates 
> any size).  
>   +                David is finishing up prototyping a replacement for 
>   +                apr_pool_t that is defined as an SMS (I believe it is
>   +                API-compatible).  Not ready for prime-time, but ready 
>   +                for us to start working out the kinks and actually 
>   +                starting to use SMS.

Sander


Mime
View raw message