apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ben Laurie <...@algroup.co.uk>
Subject Re: mem locking (was: Re: cvs commit: apr/memory/unix apr_sms.c)
Date Mon, 11 Jun 2001 19:41:45 GMT
David Reid wrote:
> > This thread is getting rather long, but I don't see the motivation.
> >
> > What is the requirement for this range locking? We don't have to do
> > everything imaginable simply because we can. Every time we load "features"
> > into APR(UTIL), that just means we need to maintain them. Why do we *need*
> > this feature? And will it be widely useful?
> >
> > I'm not seeing it.
> Me neither.  It'll be a PITA to implement and not worth our while IMHO.

Sheesh! I don't see it either, which is why I asked. :-)




"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff

View raw message