apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <l...@samba-tng.org>
Subject Re: [PATCH] Some named pipe hacking...
Date Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:42:01 GMT
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 12:54:26PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> From: "Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton" <lkcl@samba-tng.org>

> > above were to say, well, if you have the same names, but
> > different functionality, why would you want to limit
> > the [apr] functionality to that of the least-functional
> > api?
acknowledged and already understood.

btw, been thinking a lot but too busy
to write it up: 200 o/s msgs and only 30mins/day to
clear them.

a) the NAL would go a long way to fulfilling that bold statement
and also providing the functionality i will need.

b) i have to say, after a lot of thought, that for xvl
(but not for a dce/rpc and smb client/server implementation)
the apr_namedpipe_xxx() api - as posted - *as long as
it's possible to do a select / listen / accept on all
platforms* - will be enough.

> > ...tell you what, i will write up an API proposal and
> > morph some code to an apr api.  less talk, more code :)
> That would help the discussion and simply call them remote pipes.
i thought maybe ntpipes?  remotepipe is just as good.

all best, 


View raw message