apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkra...@ebuilt.com>
Subject Re: [PATCH] Some named pipe hacking...
Date Thu, 21 Jun 2001 14:44:25 GMT
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 02:35:19PM +0200, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> thanks bill!
> recommendation.  use the actual expected format for pipename:
> pass in "\\.\\PIPE\pipename" _not_ "pipename" and have it
> hidden / constructed by apr.

Can you please give a concrete example why you need this?

I don't think any of us are seeing why you need to use the Win32 naming
conventions for a pipe.  What you are suggesting goes against all of the
precedents in APR.  -- justin

View raw message