apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <l...@samba-tng.org>
Subject Re: More migration of code from httpd to apr-util
Date Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:15:14 GMT
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 12:30:59PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> From: <rbb@covalent.net>
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 10:58 AM
> > > Which is also a requirement.  When we call namedpipe_create, we have to RETURN
> > > SOMETHING!  Win32 will create a pipe handle (not the same as the read/write
> > > handle.)  Every (NT/2000) machine could Create or Connect to get that pipe
> > > But once that pipe  handle is closed, the pipe evaporates, they are not persistant.

is there anybody out there who really understands, or has used,
pipes on NT?

CreateIoCompletionPort!  that's the one!!!  dammit, not
WaitNamedPipeHandleState, what am i talking about.

okay, just looking at  the online MSDN on ms's site,
the function i am referring to that is somewhat equivalent
to listen/accept, esp. for use in multi-threaded code,
is CreateIoComplationPort.

i could be wrong: it may be possible to just use the
message-based functions CallNamedPipe, TransactNamedPipe

help, help, who really 'gets' this stuff?

[i understand what it looks like over-the-wire when
this stuff happens over SMB, but have no connection
back to the Win32 APIs that *generate* that network


View raw message