apr-dev mailing list archives

On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 06:12:17PM -0000, dreid@apache.org wrote:
>   - add an apr_pool_t to the sms structure

-1 (non-veto, but awfully close).  Uh, why are we doing this? 

I thought that a pool would be defined in terms of a sms (not now, but
at some point).  This would not allow that to happen.  

I'm still not entirely sold on the fact that sms needs locks.  I think
the locks can be handled at a higher level than sms (i.e. a pool).  

My $.02.  -- justin