apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bill Stoddard" <b...@wstoddard.com>
Subject Re: Accept mutex
Date Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:36:13 GMT
I have expressed my distaste for the "one mutex fits all" approach of APR for quite a
while.  +1

Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Jagielski" <jim@jaguNET.com>
To: <new-httpd@apache.org>; <dev@apr.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 9:20 AM
Subject: Accept mutex


> I've been toying with the idea of making the accept mutex selection
> a runtime rather than compile-time option. This makes sense to me
> for certain applications. At present, however, APR decides the mutex
> type and Apache uses that. So we either need some way for APR to
> determine all possible available options, and then "enable" them
> (provide the required calls) and then have an Apache directive do the
> required right-thing to pick the one you want.
>
> One way would be to add another argument to the APR call that defines
> the lock type (enum would be best, 'natch). Whatcha think?
> --
> ===========================================================================
>    Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
>                     "It's *good* to be the King."
>


Mime
View raw message