apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David Reid" <dr...@jetnet.co.uk>
Subject Re: mem locking (was: Re: cvs commit: apr/memory/unix apr_sms.c)
Date Mon, 11 Jun 2001 10:45:07 GMT
> This thread is getting rather long, but I don't see the motivation.
> What is the requirement for this range locking? We don't have to do
> everything imaginable simply because we can. Every time we load "features"
> into APR(UTIL), that just means we need to maintain them. Why do we *need*
> this feature? And will it be widely useful?
> I'm not seeing it.

Me neither.  It'll be a PITA to implement and not worth our while IMHO.


View raw message