| Message view | « Date » · « Thread » |
|---|---|
| Top | « Date » · « Thread » |
| From | "David Reid" <dr...@jetnet.co.uk> |
| Subject | Re: mem locking (was: Re: cvs commit: apr/memory/unix apr_sms.c) |
| Date | Mon, 11 Jun 2001 10:45:07 GMT |
> This thread is getting rather long, but I don't see the motivation. > > What is the requirement for this range locking? We don't have to do > everything imaginable simply because we can. Every time we load "features" > into APR(UTIL), that just means we need to maintain them. Why do we *need* > this feature? And will it be widely useful? > > I'm not seeing it. Me neither. It'll be a PITA to implement and not worth our while IMHO. david | |
| Mime |
|
| View raw message | |