Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 21:33:54 -0700
From: Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkrantz@ebuilt.com>
To: Christian Gross <ChristianGross@yahoo.de>
Cc: dev@apr.apache.org
Subject: Re: SMS and Windows
Message-ID: <20010524213353.Q5487@ebuilt.com>
References: <ackrgtcar2c9g3md8b82pjt4sce51bhsc3@4ax.com>
 <101501c0e4cb$dbe33b10$94c0b0d0@roweclan.net>
 <93mrgt8s3850kejms45bcg4rdm7kfemdcm@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <93mrgt8s3850kejms45bcg4rdm7kfemdcm@4ax.com>;
 from ChristianGross@yahoo.de on Fri, May 25, 2001 at 12:03:56AM -0400

On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 12:03:56AM -0400, Christian Gross wrote:
> No I do not think that at all.  I was inspecting the code in the UNIX
> and thought that yes it was pretty cross-platform.    
> 
> But what led me to this question was because none of the files were
> referenced in the project files.  For example there is the test file
> testmem.c, which was also not referenced in the aprtest project.
> 
> Hence since none of the SMS was being referenced in Windows I thought
> there was a good reason for that, which I was missing.  And hence why
> I posted this question.
> 
> But thank-you for the explanation on the apr/component/plat, etc.

AFAIK, no one (even Unix) is *using* SMS right now.  I think when Dave gets
back (think he said something about being gone for a week - not sure -
maybe I'm confused), he might add some more stuff - I think Sander has
a few patches outstanding?  But, I think it is waiting for the SMS code
to be stable (this is really being driven by the Samba people - they
know where this is going far better than I) and then it needs to be 
tested and integrated with apr_pool_t.  -- justin