apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Cliff Woolley <cliffwool...@yahoo.com>
Subject RE: [PATCH] APR Stackable Memory System
Date Mon, 21 May 2001 16:16:52 GMT
On Mon, 21 May 2001, Sander Striker wrote:

> dreid>   Why not stick to the standard apr format of
> dreid>
> dreid>   apr_status_t abort_fn(char *sourcefile, int lineno);
>
> striker> Ahh, there is such a function? I need to do a lot of digging into
> APR.

Hmm... yeah, that's a point.  Then again, if the abort_fn is basically
just abort(), then it's pretty easy to do a debugger backtrace and get all
the sourcefile/lineno information for the entire call stack that way.  I
really don't think we should be adding sourcefile/lineno arguments to ALL
of the SMS functions...

Well, whatever.  Other opinions?

--Cliff


--------------------------------------------------------------
   Cliff Woolley
   cliffwoolley@yahoo.com
   Charlottesville, VA



Mime
View raw message