apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David Reid" <dr...@jetnet.co.uk>
Subject Re: Memory code...
Date Wed, 09 May 2001 18:00:33 GMT
OK.  I've also made some more changes so that the _free and _destroy
functions return an APR_STATUS code rather than a void.  A lot of compilers
moan when you try to use a void and being able to check the return value is
a good thing.  On that note we should probably have the individual systems
also returning an apr_status_t from their free functions and passing the
value back up to the main free and then back to the user, in case of an

I'll be committing some changes real soon...

The test app is written and once CVS gets sorted out I'll commit it.

Looking at the function names, can we drop the system and simply refer to
all this as apr_memory_t and so on?

Any thoughts?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton" <lkcl@samba-tng.org>
To: "David Reid" <dreid@jetnet.co.uk>
Cc: "APR Development List" <dev@apr.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 6:04 PM
Subject: Re: Memory code...

> > BTW, what is Elrond's last name???
> we don't know :)  that _is_ his name :)

View raw message