Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 20440 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2001 17:48:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 20402 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2001 17:48:35 -0000 Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 10:48:11 -0700 From: Justin Erenkrantz To: Ian Holsman Cc: "'dev@apr.apache.org'" Subject: Re: apr_snprintf fails on solaris 2.6 Message-ID: <20010427104811.B29185@ebuilt.com> References: <3482305AF0F6CF469ED45C0D48FAFCF7091FF0C6@cnet10.cnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3482305AF0F6CF469ED45C0D48FAFCF7091FF0C6@cnet10.cnet.com>; from IanH@cnet.com on Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 10:06:16AM -0700 X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1-pre3 (http://amavis.org/) X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 10:06:16AM -0700, Ian Holsman wrote: > Solaris 2.6 does not have a 'isinf' function mail.apache.org seems to be lagging about 10 minutes behind. Makes for duplicate patches everywhere... =) I've also seen some stuff for Netware go in. Yum. -- justin