Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 79980 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2001 02:29:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 79969 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2001 02:29:42 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: mako.covalent.net: dougm owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 18:28:46 -0800 (PST) From: Doug MacEachern To: Greg Stein cc: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: add rename symbols to ap*_compat.h In-Reply-To: <20010218172912.H29904@lyra.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Greg Stein wrote: > Yes, I was thinking the 2.0 names. Personally, I don't care about them at > all. I'd just as soon not worry about compat names for them, but was under > the impression that other people wanted API consistency with our previous > 2.0 alpha releases. it would be easy to generate one, but everybody seemed ok with running the apr_rename.pl script on their project trees. i was under the impression we did not want compat foo for anything other than 1.3.x names, at least not in the cvs tree. > > btw, i missed one apr_clear_pool -> apr_pool_clear, ok to make that > > change? > > Of course :-) done.