Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 204 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2001 21:29:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 99798 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2001 21:29:02 -0000 Sender: gregames@Mail.MeepZor.Com Message-ID: <3A8C49C3.15EB4D5F@raleigh.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 16:27:31 -0500 From: Greg Ames X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17-21mdk i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: threads on FreeBSD - disable? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N rbb@covalent.net wrote: > > > So far it seems counterproductive to build a threaded APR app on > > FreeBSD. I suggest that APR needs logic like the following: > > > > if FreeBSD: > > if --enable-threads specified, > > abort configure with an error message > > else > > configure without thread support > > > > Maybe other apps work fine (so far :) ) using threaded APR on BSD? > > > > Thoughts? It is pretty sucky to disable thread support, but it is > > even worse to present it as working and end up tracking down weird > > problems caused by the way we tickle the thread library or perhaps > > just the thread library itself. > > I would suggest just putting this into hints.m4 for APR, so that we > automagically disable threading on FreeBSD for anything before > 4.2-STABLE. Rumor is that 4.2-STABLE has valid thread support. > I wouldn't put much stock into this source of rumors. daedalus is on 4.2-STABLE, and it's pretty hosed when you run Apache 2.0 prefork built with threads enabled. Greg