apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Rall <...@collab.net>
Subject Re: Poliicy proposal.
Date Mon, 12 Feb 2001 21:04:16 GMT
Ben Hyde <bhyde@pobox.com> writes:

> rbb@covalent.net wrote:
>  > On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Ben Hyde wrote:
>  > >  > APACHE_2_0 or SUBVERSION_X_Y.
>  > > 
>  > > I find this weird
> 
> still
[...]
>  > as easy as possible.
> 
> it's weird for tags in apr to named after user's projects.
[...]
> meanwhile the apr using code should be paranoid
> at compile & runtime about what version of apr
> they are associating with.
> 
> sequential fast moving build numbers are good 
> for this.

I agree with Ben.  What's the problem with doing another tag of APR
whenever one of the two projects driving development needs a tag for
its own build?
-- 

Daniel Rall <dlr@finemaltcoding.com>

Mime
View raw message